Investor and sales decks for hardware, semiconductor, energy and biotech companies. The deck has to survive a generalist partner on Monday and the technical diligence that follows, and most decks are built for only one of them.
Four reasons deep tech decks fail that a SaaS deck never has to solve.
Seed through Series B. The narrative arc, the mechanism slides, the market frame and the ask.
The slides the diligence call actually opens. Built to be read by someone qualified to disagree.
The version that goes to a buyer or a procurement panel rather than an investor.
Custom, drawn from your spec or CAD, not stock iconography.
Your figures, plotted so the significance is legible to a non-specialist and honest to a specialist.
In your tooling, so the deck stays current after we leave.
Raised and on a growth path.
Advanced nuclear reactors engineered and built in India, for sovereign and reliable clean power.
Both, and the writing is the larger half. A deck that is beautifully set and argues badly is a worse deck than an ugly one that argues well.
Usually. If the position is settled and the problem is that the deck does not land, that is a rebuild of the argument on top of what you have. If the position is not settled, the deck is not the first problem.
Your engineers, before anything is designed. Same review stage as a film. A wrong figure in a deck is caught in the room it was meant to win.
Two to four weeks on its own. Faster when the positioning already exists, because most of the time goes into the argument rather than the layout.
Yes, and it is the normal starting point. Most of what a deep tech deck contains is unannounced.
Thirty minutes, no deck from us. We will tell you which category you are being read into and what we would change first.
Book a 30-minute audit →(opens in a new tab)